Inter- and intraobserver variability in the assessment of brain arteriovenous malformation angioarchitecture and endovascular treatment results.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Several angiographic features of brain arteriovenous malformations (BAVMs) have been associated with an increased risk of hemorrhage. However, interpretation of these features may not be consistent between observers. We conducted a study to determine inter- and intraobserver agreement of various angioarchitectural characteristics of BAVM. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two experienced interventional neuroradiologists independently reviewed pre- and post-endovascular treatment angiograms from 50 consecutive patients. Axial CT and/or MR images before treatment were included. We collected the following data: Spetzler-Martin grades, number of involved arterial territories, associated aneurysms by location (circle of Willis, feeding artery, intranidal, and venous), and nidus reduction after endovascular treatment (<33%, 33%-66%, and >66%). The reviewers were compared with each other, and 1 was compared with himself after a 3-month interval. Measures of agreement were performed by using the kappa statistic (kappa) for nominal data and the weighted kappa for ordinal data. RESULTS Inter- and intraobserver agreement were higher for assessment of the Spetzler-Martin grade (weighted kappa = 0.70/0.75) and nidus size reduction after endovascular treatment (kappa = 0.74/0.77). Inter- and intraobserver agreement were inferior for findings concerning feeding artery aneurysms (kappa = 0.19/0.36), intranidal aneurysms (kappa = 0.34/0.35), and venous aneurysms (kappa = 0.50/0.67). CONCLUSION Angiographic characteristics of BAVMs considered as risk factors for hemorrhage, such as aneurysms, are not reliably detected on global angiograms between different observers. In contrast, the Spetzler-Martin grading system and angiographic results of endovascular treatment can be used with high observer agreement.